"The Courts take the view that litigation should be a last resort, and that claims should not be issued prematurely when a settlement is still being actively explored. Parties are warned that if the Protocol is not followed (including this paragraph) then the Court must have regard to such conduct when determining costs."
[41st Update of the Civil Procedure Rules, Practice Direction Protocols, Section II, Paragraph 4.7]
To comply with the Protocol means parties should consider whether some form of alternative dispute resolution procedure would be more suitable than litigation, and if so, endeavour to agree which form to adopt. Both the Claimant and Defendant may be required by the Court to provide evidence that alternative means of resolving their dispute were considered.
Contents of the Case Review Service
To assist professional implementation of the new amendment, and in general the Court's preference for ADR, CEDR Solve has launched a support service which will both offer advice and demonstrate a party's consideration of ADR. The optional elements of this service are:
Please note the Case Review Service is available to all sides in a dispute and is available at all stages of dispute, pre and post-issue.
1 Jul 2008
Mediation: protection by privilege and confidentiality?
23 Jun 2008
Business Relationships expert joins CEDR
18 Jun 2008
W(h)ither Halsey? Part 2 - a view from the motorbike
11 Jun 2008
CEDR Solve’s direct panel expands to 50 mediators
Wednesday 10 September 2008
Exchange Forum
Thursday 11 September 2008
'Meet the Mediators' - Sheffield
Thursday 25 September 2008
16.30 - 18.30Mediator debrief