"The Courts take the view that litigation should be a last resort, and that claims should not be issued prematurely when a settlement is still being actively explored. Parties are warned that if the Protocol is not followed (including this paragraph) then the Court must have regard to such conduct when determining costs."
[41st Update of the Civil Procedure Rules, Practice Direction Protocols, Section II, Paragraph 4.7]
To comply with the Protocol means parties should consider whether some form of alternative dispute resolution procedure would be more suitable than litigation, and if so, endeavour to agree which form to adopt. Both the Claimant and Defendant may be required by the Court to provide evidence that alternative means of resolving their dispute were considered.
Contents of the Case Review Service
To assist professional implementation of the new amendment, and in general the Court's preference for ADR, CEDR Solve has launched a support service which will both offer advice and demonstrate a party's consideration of ADR. The optional elements of this service are:
Please note the Case Review Service is available to all sides in a dispute and is available at all stages of dispute, pre and post-issue.
11 Jun 2009
Thoughts from the ABA Dispute Resolution Conference
8 Jun 2009
Are you up to the challenge of the new ACAS code?
4 Jun 2009
New standard for high-level negotiation with new advanced certificate
16 May 2009
Advancing ADR in personal injury claims
Monday 6 July 2009
CANCELLED (To be rescheduled) Seminar: Breakthrough Conversations - Leeds
Thursday 9 July 2009
10:00- 17:30 Managing High Emotions In Mediation
Friday 17 July 2009
17-18 and 20-22 July 2009 Mediator Skills Training - Fast Track